Dragnix.Net

Sorry all, Mcafee is being a "lady of the street" to put it into politically correct words.

*ahem* I enjoyed the blood arch, and I really enjoyed legions. Legions basically was a newbe pool when it first was created. Most of those who were not serious about it dropped. Eventually it was down to me and Fyre. Yeah... THat was about it. Medea, Fyre, and I finished it.

Rubin went on to start other legends, and Rusabek just ceased to exist after the board's demise. It would be good to get him out of the grave...

Rubin is one of my favorite characters next to Ragon and Exan.

And yes Midnight, all my works unless stated otherwise are open to "newbes"

and yes I am eighteen... Though some say I truly do not act my age...

Ok... I am out of retirement...

Which thread shall I create... I will let you all decide.

Tales of the Blood Arch,

Legions,

Or Exanderous'es Ascension

Tales of Exanderous' Legions! Mhhhmmm.......I say blood arch.

wow, we have to choose? Hmmm, I'd have to go with blood arch.

My biggest fear of blood arch is that in my absense I believe my skills have deminished. That and the story will probably reach no where near the glory it once held...

i vote blood arch. my character, Consti wants some real fun.

I vote Legions, but then that's kind of expected huh? anyone whjo had the joy of reading the last one will realised just how much time and work went into it! it was such fun!

That or, I think Exanderous's tale would be great to finish. I don't know about you Ex, but I have a couple of Characters who can't be developed much more and a finish to them would put the lid on it and do it in a fantastic way. I get the feeling that Exanderous is that character for you...he's had many an adventure, perhaps it's time to retire him?

if we were to do Legions, I think I would use Travis only a little and concentrate on the here and now of the Order, not the past.

He could always do a prequal and play as a young Exx. Lol!

I vote for Blood Arch. I know that Im still a noob compared to all of you but I fill as though Blood Arch has the most potential, besides Legions.

I am looking to retire Exanderous for story purposes. I have one final step for him and then I doubt I could ever use him again.

Legions is a great story with a lot of work put in.

Blood Arch was just plain fun! Rusabek and I'zack were nutty as all get out. I remember the introduction of the two characters just yelling at each other until they saw Lili's Dragon.

Funny times.

yeah, they were

heh, if we do blood arch, we are going to need a dragon charrie...

Heh a dragon did make things interesting, but we do not have to have one.

Well if you want a dragon to make it interesting, I'll be happy to be that dragon.

Hey! No fair! I was going to say that! Well, in that case do you think it would be Ok for me to use a character based on Midnight? I'll have to make it different because she's some what of a godess now, and I know thats against the rules. Then theres the fact that she's so far from human.

Midnight points up at her overly large dragon ears,silver fur,and doggy nose. Then she swings her slinder tail to and fro to get he poit acrossed.

See!

In that case... I cant use Kojack. He is the G.O.W. (god of war). I can, however, use ColLon HudAng because he is a dragon.

If we do blood arch, the characters have to be toned down a great deal. I created totally new characters last time 'round because my others were too advanced for the thread. Its basically mortal vs mortal.

you know I've never use Tarin to completion in a thread! she always dies or the thread runs out of steam. it'd be nice to use her properly.

mortal characters? hang on...:rummages through filing cabinets:...YAY! I knew i had some in here some where.

Um, well then, how bout Cleeishies? she's all mortal, except for the fact that she's a vampirum's wife. Is that Mortal enough? I've been working with a more adult virshion of the character, and I've been meaning to work with her more as the way I should for the book I'm writing, which I was thinking about trying out as a roll-play first just to see how it would go.

I kinda decided against it because there'd be too many set characters and rules that I don't think many people would like. I figure most poeple would reable against the idea because the wouldn't get to be as creative.

If I cant be a dragon then can I use a charecter of mine called Quazar'Catri? He is a mortal. I can give you more information on him if you like.

but surely dragons can be mortal. mortal don't mean Man, but that it can be killed/die.

Your right about that Fyre. Although my personal defintion of the word mortal is:

- can be killed/die
- does not have an insane amount of magic, or has no magic at all
-more weapon oriented.


Just because a character is mortal, doesn't mean that it's human.

We had a dragon last round, and usually the good, solid, plot reinforcing problems that I threw out there were easily taken care of by the dragon. To make things interesting, no dragons if you will. Only one can be a dragon, and I do not think she remains on the board.

The only reason why I would allow her to have a dragon would be because her character, Lili, had become an essential character.

Ok looks like Blood Arch is going to be it. To those who were in it before, shall we recreate it? Or just start off on the other foot.

up to you mate, I'm sure it'll turn out well regardless.